Nooface
search Nooface:
 
In Search of the Post-PC Interface
 
Nooface
- Home
- About
- FAQ
- Discussions
- Journals
- Messages
- Topics
- Contact

- Preferences
- Older Stuff
- Past Polls
- Submit Story


Resources
- 3D User Interfaces
- Archives

 
Is Windows Too Complicated For Mobile Devices?
posted by Editor on Monday October 09, @06:00PM
Mobile Computing Interfaces In this review of the Motorola Q mobile phone, Simson Garfinkel claims that the device is made more complicated by using Microsoft's Windows Mobile operating system. Microsoft's design philosophy, which is that the user should have lots of options and be made constantly aware of what is happening on the computer, does not work well in a compact, mobile environment. Garfinkel likes the phone itself, but he believes that its hardware is underexploited by the Windows Mobile software. Users need to install Microsoft's ActiveSync software, which is a complicated process, and basic entertainment functions like playing mp3 files are hampered by the clumsy integration of Microsoft's Media Player software.

Using Grid Computing To Pick Stocks | Software Lets Consumers Access Their Private Media Over The Web  >

 

 
Nooface Login
Nickname:

Password:

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
  • review
  • Motorola Q
  • Simson Garfinkel
  • Windows Mobile
  • More on Mobile Computing Interfaces
  • Also by Editor
  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Is Windows Too Complicated For Mobile Devices? | Login/Create an Account | Top | 2 comments | Search Discussion
    Threshold:
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Korner Krunch. (Score:0)
    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 10, @06:10PM (#41)
    "Microsoft's design philosophy, which is that the user should have lots of options and be made constantly aware of what is happening on the computer, does not work well in a compact, mobile environment."

    Sounds a lot like the KDE philosophy.
    Garfinkel misses the point (Score:1)
    by d on Wednesday October 11, @02:23AM (#42)
    User #3 Info
    "Microsoft's design philosophy, which is that the user should have lots of options and be made constantly aware of what is happening on the computer, does not work well in a compact, mobile environment."

    Is the concept of user awareness unreasonable for mobile devices or is it just the metaphor or concept Microsoft uses, that is broken?

    I think there's nothing wrong with transparency / letting the users know what happens, but the whole idea to port something, that was thougt to mimic a desktop 35 years ago, to tiny screens with minimal interface devices, seems just ridiculous. When was the last time you had a desktop your pocket?

    I'm not a robot like you. I don't like having disks crammed into me... unless they're Oreos, and then only in the mouth. -- Fry

    [ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | faq | authors | preferences ]