Nooface
search Nooface:
 
In Search of the Post-PC Interface
 
Nooface
- Home
- About
- FAQ
- Discussions
- Journals
- Messages
- Topics
- Contact

- Preferences
- Older Stuff
- Past Polls
- Submit Story


Resources
- 3D User Interfaces
- Archives

 
Illiterate Street Children Teach Themselves The Rudiments Of The Web
posted by Editor on Monday September 17, @11:39PM
User Interface Innovation According to this BBC article, a researcher in Delhi, India, installed a computer on the wall of his office facing a slum and watched what happened. Children in the slum were intrigued by the icons on the computer, and completely without any help, gradually figured out how to use the computers and access the Internet. At first, they thought it was just a TV, but then they figured out that cursor changed to a hand shape when they brought it close to an underlined word, after which they discovered that they could change pages. After about eight minutes, they were actually surfing. While this was just an isolated experiment, the results show that while current user interfaces may be baffling to adults, children adapt to a new system far more quickly, and will really exploit the system to get the most out of it.

A "Graphical" Command Line Interface | Survey Of 100 Headmounted Displays  >

 

 
Nooface Login
Nickname:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Go Create One. A user account will let you customize the site's content according to your preferences. It will also allow you to moderate the comments of other users.

Related Links
  • BBC article
  • More on User Interface Innovation
  • Also by Editor
  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    So we need more useful UIs, not simpler ones? (Score:1)
    by Greg Weiss on Tuesday September 18, @01:11PM EST (#1)
    (User #10 Info)
    If children can pick up new WIMP user interfaces easily (which, frankly, fits my experience watching 3-5 year olds use PCs), I doubt they need something "easier-to-use" than WIMP.

    WIMP beat out CLIs because they were "easier to use", but if WIMPs are "good enough" on the ease-of-use front (as this study somewhat implies- once 'oldtimers' die off), wouldn't this also imply that a post-WIMP interface would succeed due to some entirely different advantage?

        --Greg
    Re:So we need more useful UIs, not simpler ones? (Score:0)
    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 20, @07:55PM EST (#2)
    Have you read the paper The Anti-Mac Interface? The WIMP/desktop metaphor is little old fashioned by now. For example, today's children see a folder on the computer screen first, before they get to see a physical manilla folder in an office...

    ...richie

    Re:So we need more useful UIs, not simpler ones? (Score:1)
    by Ed Avis (epa98@doc.ic.ac.uk) on Friday September 21, @01:46AM EST (#3)
    (User #28 Info)
    The point is that the interface should be *easy to start learning*. You should start getting results with the first few steps you make, and go from there. Learning a CLI requires a lot of initial effort before you can do anything at all, if you are starting from knowing nothing about computers.

    Anyway, these children didn't really learn the WIMP interface at first. They started off by learning the Web, which is about as simple compared to the whole menus-checkboxes-taskbar-dialogues thing as WIMP is to a command line.
    -- Ed Avis Finger for PGP key

    I'm not a robot like you. I don't like having disks crammed into me... unless they're Oreos, and then only in the mouth. -- Fry

    [ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | faq | authors | preferences ]